Redacted Poetry Lesson #MeToo

Redacted Poetry Lesson #MeToo - word choice

This is a lesson I made on redacted poetry to get students to really think about the choices writers make about the words they use. This is based on the erasure poetry of Isobel O'Hare on the #MeToo

movement.
I find students struggle to explain the effects of writer's methods because they can't articulate or even consider something as simple as word choice, much less more complex techniques. This lesson was to address this and really get them thinking about what a writer is saying both overtly and in the subtext of their writing, why they are conveying it the way they are and how their words hold power.

The lesson starts with a clearly forced and insincere apology and get students to think about its subtext and why it may not be sincere:

Then I teach some context about the #MeToo

movement.

Now, because they really need to think about the word choice and the power of words, I show how the poet transformed Weinstein’s 'apology' into a redacted poem. We talk about the problem with the apology to begin with and how O'Hare has used his own words against him. Why those words, as opposed to others in the text? Why is it powerful as a piece of poetry? How is it even classified as poetry?

Now they’ve seen an example, they attempt to redact Kevin Spacey's apology without looking at O’Hare’s version and try to use our discussion to think carefully about which words hold the most power and how their intent can be subverted/illuminated. This is very much a guided task, started off under the visualiser and then they continue it, discussing it in pairs as they work.

Showing them O'Hare's version at this point allows them to compare their word choice with hers and consider why she made the choices she did. Also it gets them exploring the reasoning behind their own choices and start articulating these - how can they do this with someone else's hypothetical choices, if they can't do it for their own? It is a good opportunity to consider the varying impact between the two - how can the same text deliver such different effects?

Now there's been an (I) do and a we do, they do the same with Trump's apology:

My students really engaged with this lesson and while there were varying examples, with varied sophistication, what I did get from every single student was a real consideration of word choices - that has to be the first step into more in-depth analysis and a better quality of writing.
All resources are available on the 'Resources' page of this blog.

Comments

Differentiation: shattering the glass ceiling and stepping up to the challenge

Over the last few years, what we see and what we expect to see in the classroom has massively changed. We’ve gone from super-pacey, four-part, not-too-much-teacher-talkey lessons, to progress for the long haul, repeated learning and in-depth modelling. This is much more a shift in mentality than it is just methodology and thankfully, the same can be said for differentiation. But it is still something so easy to get wrong! Despite all the controversy that comes with differentiation, with high challenge and upward scaffolding, the glass ceilings once put in place with it, can still be shattered for the wide range of students our classrooms hold. While the transformation of what we know as differentiation is in no way complete, we can still adapt during its transition to something better - it is just a case of reassessing how we are differentiating and why. The past life of differentiation Previously, the suggestions and perhaps expectations of differentiation were planning using “All, mo

Managing the markload

There is no way to dress it up - marking is and will always be one of the biggest burdens in teaching. The other things like planning, training, meetings and emails all push themselves to the top of the to-do list - their turnarounds are short and they can’t be left. You can’t not plan your lessons, not turn up to meetings (tempting as it may sound) and the emails demand responses. So marking, despite being an incredibly valuable teaching tool, gets left to the wayside. It causes a great deal of anxiety for so many as the pile continues to grow or is something that forever needs doing. It is also one of the biggest reasons so many work well beyond 8-5 and spend so much of their holidays working instead of relaxing and recharging. It will always be a challenge, particularly if you too teach essay subjects like English but there are some tools that have helped me to avoid bringing marking home and to some extent staying if not on top of it, at least afloat. Marking codes The most mundane

Misconceptions about ‘Mixed Ability’ in English

The mixed vs set ability debate is not a new one. It has gone round the houses, done its laps and the research and general consensus seem to have settled quite firmly in favour of blended classes. So why write about it now? Mainly because I (like many on the other side of the debate) was completely and utterly against the introduction of mixed ability classes when it was first discussed in our department. Many of the titular misconceptions were my own but having now researched, taught the classes and reaped the benefits fully mixed sets bring, I have deserted post and I am firmly in the mixed ability camp. Here’s what I thought versus what I found: 1. Differentiation and Challenge is too difficult For context, our previous configuration was to have two top sets on each side of the year with rest in mixed classes, so from my prior experience, going fully mixed would have been extra work for the teachers while taking away specific focus on learners’ needs. But how wrong I was! My ant

Miss Mika (English)

Search This Blog